Tag Archive for 'Animation'

How to Watch: “Despicable Me”

Step 1. Don’t mess with a good thing. Despicable Me follows a tried and true formula of good story + decent animation = entertaining family film. But it isn’t quite up to Pixar quality.

Step 2. Realize it can’t all be Pixar. I’ve said it before and will most likely say it again: Pixar sets a high bar when it comes to animated films. In essence, every other animated film (yes, I count the DreamWorks ones, too) seems to pale, even in the smallest degrees, in comparison. Thankfully, Despicable Me falls in the smallest degree category, meaning it does hold up better well under the Pixar microscope.

Step 3. Call your hero Gru. The story revolves around a wannabe bad guy named Gru (Steve Carell), who, up to this point, hasn’t really achieved truly evil mastermind status. I mean, the best he’s done is to steal the Statue of Liberty… the small one from Las Vegas. He tries, though, exciting his army of minions (little yellow creatures that look like pill capsules with goggles) with dastardly plans and inventing new – and mostly useless – devices to carry out such plans. But when a young whipper snapper evil genius named Vector (Jason Segel) starts beating Gru to the punch, Gru decides he’ll do the impossible – steal the Moon – to outshine his competitor. But Gru actually has some redeeming qualities, which come out when he adopts three little girls from the local orphanage as a way to get into Vector’s lair and unexpectedly becomes attached to them. Aw, turns out the hunched bald guy is a big softie after all! Does he eventually steal the moon? Or does he chuck his evil plans to make it to the girls’ ballet recital? I’m not going to tell; you’ll have to see for yourself.

Step 4. Hire a good vocal cast. Carell perfectly voices this loathsome yet sweet character, who is a cross between The Addams Family’s Uncle Fester and Boris Karloff. Segel plays Vector as a spoiled brat with too much time on his hands. The three girls, voiced by iCarly’s Miranda Cosgrove, Dana Gaier and Elsie Fisher, are adorable, especially Fisher whose line “It’s so FLUFFY!” makes me laugh every time I hear it in the trailer. Other supporting voices include Kristen Wiig as the mean orphanage owner; Russell Brand as Gru’s mad scientist partner; Will Arnett as the president of the evil mastermind bank (they’ve got to get their money for their doomsday machines somewhere); and then the minions, who almost always steal the show. I can see those toys all over the floor now.

Level of difficulty in watching Despicable Me: Nil. BUT … If Toy Story 3 had not just come out, I might be singing Despicable Me‘s highest praises. It’s hard for me to watch another film of its ilk and say, “Oh yeah, that’s just as good or even better.” Sorry, I can’t do it. Still, Despicable Me does what it sets out to do, and audiences of all ages should enjoy themselves.

How to Watch: “Toy Story 3″

Step 1: Improve on a classic. Toy Story 3 doesn’t try to surpass its predecessors but simply continues the story in such a wonderful, natural progression that it melds with ease into the brilliance that is the Toy Story lore. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, it’ll become a part of you.

Step 2: Have no fear. I felt a little trepidation about a third Toy Story, only because the first two were so fantastic, I was afraid the third one couldn’t measure up. Now, of course, I just shake my head. Toy Story is what started the whole trend of animated excellence from Pixar, with Toy Story 2 being one of those rare occasions a sequel stood on its own as a classic. Why wouldn’t the third in the franchise shine just as brightly as the first two, and then some? It’s sort of silly I doubted it.

Step 3: Continue the story. In the 11 years since we last saw Woody (Tom Hanks), Buzz Lightyear (Tim Allen) and the gang, the toys have finally been put in the toy box, as their owner Andy has grown older. They miss being played with, but they understand how it goes. Just so long as they have each other, it should be OK. And when Andy is finally heading off to college, some of the toys, including Jessie (Joan Cusack), are afraid they may be discarded once and for all, but Woody assures them Andy will take care of them, even if that means they’ll all go into the attic for awhile. But through a mishap in cleaning the room, the gang ends up getting donated to a local daycare center, where they meet other toys in their same predicament — or so they think. Turns out, the daycare world of toys is run by one rough, stuffed bear named Lotso (Ned Beatty), who rules with fear and intimidation. Our gang of toys quickly realize they need to get out of there and back to Andy pronto, before it’s too late. Let the great escape begin.

Step 4: Bring back all the familiar voices. Hanks, Allen, Cusack, Wallace Shawn, John Ratzenberger, Don Rickles, Estelle Harris, plus a few new ones, add colorfully to the mix, including stand out Michael Keaton as the narcissistic Ken, the groovy cool cat with an ascot and a huge wardrobe of clothes. Think of him as the plastic, small, ever-tan male doll version of Sex and the City‘s Carrie Bradshaw. Ken definitely provides many of the film’s guffaws. Character actor Beatty does a nice job as the heavy, and try to recognize the voices of Whoopi Goldberg, Bonnie Hunt, Jeff Garlin, and many others.

Step 5: Hail to Pixar! Seriously, those folks over there never cease to amaze me — and I seem to write that every time I review one of their movies. At some point, I may be disappointed, but it’s hard to see how that might happen. Toy Story 3 is so full of rich, hilarious, wonderful, scary, meaningful, heart-wrenching moments, I’m sort of tearing up all over again, just remembering. Pixar stories ALWAYS make me cry, one way or another, but Toy Story 3 really does a number on you. It’s probably because these are characters you already know and love and watching them all interact again feels so comforting and a little anxious in wondering what’s going to happen to them.

Step 6: Learn a lesson while you’re at it. Those of us who’ve been watching the movies since 1995 know the drill. For those young ones who are seeing a Toy Story for the first time, there will be times when they may get scared (the incinerator scene is a doozy) or might not understand, but I think it’s still a film for all ages. Parents may find themselves engaged in conversations afterward, about what happens to their old toys when they don’t play with them anymore or about throwing things away and what happens to trash. I’m actually one of those parents who threw old toys out and, well, I feel horrible about it now. I still have one small-ish child left, and let’s just say, I’m going to find wonderful new homes for those leftover toys when she’s done playing with them, so help me god.

Level of difficulty in watching Toy Story 3: No difficulty at all. This is another instant classic.

“How to Train Your Dragon”

Step 1: Training dragons never looked more fun. As the first animated gem of 2010, How to Train Your Dragon should see a clear path to an Oscar nomination.

Step 2: Cross it between the classic boy and his dog story and Dragonheart. HTYD does delight in so many ways. Told from the perspective of a young Viking named Hiccup (Jay Bruchel), we see how his remote seaside village is continually bombarded by various kinds of dragons. The village leader and Hiccup’s father, Stoick (Gerard Butler), rallies his fellow Vikings to hunt and kill as many of the beasts as they can, but the scrawny Hiccup doesn’t quite cut the mustard, much to his father’s chagrin.

Step 3: Use what you know. Instead, Hiccup decides to use his ingenuity and invents a contraption that will bring down the most feared – and most rare – dragon of all, the Night Fury. When it actually works, Hiccup follows its trail and discovers that the beast is just as frightened and vulnerable as he is – and extremely intelligent. And so they form a bond. Hiccup helps the dragon he names Toothless heal, while Toothless teaches Hiccup about a dragon’s true, definitely more kindhearted and loyal nature. Needless to say, there’s no way in hell Hiccup could ever kill one now, even though he’s in training to do so. And it’s going to take all of the young Viking’s courage to convince his dad dragons really aren’t the enemy at all.

Step 4: Fit the voice to the character. The vocal talent do a fine job bringing their animated characters to life. You can just see Bruchel’s (She’s Out of Your League) neurotic mannerisms in Hiccup, and Butler’s bravado in Stoick. Also good are America Ferrara as the tough Viking-in-training Astrid and Hiccup’s object of desire; Superbad buddies Christopher Mintz-Plasse and Jonah Hill as fellow Viking trainees; and Craig Ferguson as the gruff trainer Gobber.

Step 5: Use what you know, part II. Dreamworks Animation knows a thing or two about story without having to talk down to the kids or put in too many pop-culture references that can be annoying. But HTYD might be their best effort yet, since it combines the elements of a touching story with some heart-stopping visuals. Sure, every other movie made these days is in 3D, and while for some, nothing really is gained by the technology (Clash of the Titans, for example), others benefit greatly. HTYD fits in that latter category. The 3D animation absolutely dazzles – and gives the film a thrilling edge. The aerial sequences are as good – or better – than any live action shots, while the final climactic battle makes you grab the arms of your theater seat.

Level of difficulty in watching How to Train Your Dragon: Easy as soaring on the back of a dragon. HTYD is simply an entertaining adventure from start to finish.

How to Watch: “Avatar”

AvatarStep 1: Listen up, all aspiring 3D filmmakers: Pay attention to what James Cameron has done with his truly spectacular looking Avatar. This, my friends, is the right way to create a 3D film experience.

Step 2: Describe it aptly. The story isn’t half bad, either, if you don’t mind a little tree hugging here and there. In fact, the morning after the screening – as I was trying to sum up the film for my 10-year-old daughter – I said it was Dances with Wolves meets … and just as I was about to say Pocahontas, she chimes in “blue people?” After spitting out my coffee, I laughed, “Yes, that’s it exactly. Dances with Wolves meets the Blue People.” Very TALL blue people.

Step 3: Follow the traditional natives-vs.-the-big-bad-white-man scenario. A greedy corporate jerk (Giovanni Ribisi) and his military backup invade the planet Pandora to mine its precious resources in the lush woodlands and drive off its native population, the Na’vi. This doesn’t make scientist Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver) very happy since she’s been on Pandora awhile, long before the bad guys showed up, studying the Na’vi – who are completely in synch with their environs. She is also the one who developed the technology to interact with the Na’vi called “avatars.” As she AVATARand her team are plugged into cylinder machines, their Na’vi look-a-likes walk among the tribe. Things get dicey, however, when paraplegic Marine Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) shows up as the newest member of the scientific team. The gung-ho military leader Colonel Quaritch (Stephen Lang) zeroes in on Jake and convinces him to gather intel on the tribe while he is one of them. He agrees – but then Jake experiences his first real avatar excursion and is hooked. He begins bonding with the Na’vi people, who decide to train him to become a warrior, and eventually falls in love with the beautiful Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), his teacher. When Jake starts to side with the Na’vi, Quaritch takes matter into his own destructive hands. You can see where this is going, right?

Step 4: Throw some actors in there. Aussie actor Worthington continues his tough guy-with-a-heart-of-gold persona he started earlier this year in Terminator: Salvation and comes off winningly as Jake – both as the paraplegic AND as the Na’vi. Saldana, too, adds a certain tender fierceness as Neytiri, and she and Worthington make a pretty hot couple, even if they are blue. Weaver seems to be channeling a bit of her Dian Fossey from Gorillas in the Mist, protecting the planet Pandora and all, while Lang completely overdoes it as the mean old Colonel. Michelle Rodriguez as makes an appearance as yet another solider type, but who softens and becomes an ally for the good guys.

Step 5: Know who the REAL star is: writer/director James Cameron. He is incomparable wielding the reins behind the camera, a director who just can’t do the norm but must challenge himself each time he makes a movie – from the amazing visuals in Terminator 2, to sinking the Titanic so convincingly, to inventing this new AVATARform of digital 3D filmmaking with Ghost of the Abyss and now Avatar. While he may lack a certain pizazz as a screenwriter, his what must be obsessive-compulsive perfectionism in making Avatar a groundbreaking feat in filmmaking astounds you. Beyond just placing the audience “in the moment” with the 3D technology, Cameron manages to create this world of Pandora around you so exquisitely, you can almost touch it. It’s lush, mossy green, quiet, explosive, filled with sights (giant rainbow-colored flying birds, hairless dogs) and sounds (the Na’vi’s rebel yell). This guy deserves SOME kind of an award for this remarkable achievement – and with his recent Golden Globe nomination and possible Oscar nod, he may get it. Again.

Level of difficulty in watching Avatar: As easy as soaring on one of those dragon-like warrior birds the Na’vi love so much. Wheeee!

How Disney Finds Magic with a Princess and a Frog

the-princess-and-the-frog2D animation isn’t dead yet, dagnabit! It’s not surprising The Princess and the Frog won at the box office this past weekend (although the Mouse House might be a little disappointed with its $24.2 million take). The film is a wonderful reminder of how Disney truly is the king of hand-drawn animation, with the rich, lush backgrounds and a fluidity in the characters that you really can’t get anywhere else – and something CGI can’t quite accomplish, especially with the too-artificial performance-capture stuff director Robert Zemeckis loves so much.

Executive producer John Lassiter made it a point, when Pixar and Disney merged, to make more Disney hand-drawn magic and so, brought back Little Mermaid and Aladdin writer/directors Ron Clements and John Musker to helm The Princess and the Frog. They skew the original fairy tale, setting it in 1920s New Orleans, where we meet Tiana (Ankia Noni Rose), a hard-working gal who is saving up to start her own restaurant, a dream her late father (Terence Howard) once had. But she gets sidetracked when she encounters a talking frog at a costume party. She’s dressed as a princess, you see, and he wants one little kiss. Of course, this frog is actually Naveen (Bruno Campos), a real prince visiting New Orleans who gets snookered by a witch doctor named Dr. Facilier (Keith David) and transformed into said amphibian. Thing is, once Tiana kisses Naveen, she turns into a frog herself because she isn’t a real princess. Then it’s a mad dash into the bayou to find Mama Odie (Jenifer Lewis), a Cajun voodoo lady, who can turn them back into humans. PATF plays very much like a romantic comedy — Tiana and Naveen don’t like each other much at first, but soon sparks begin to simmer into something more.

PATF also brings back the splashy musical numbers, with original music from Randy Newman, who, of course, is Lassiter’s go-to guy from the Toy Story days. Maybe not up to the same caliber as an Alan Menken/Howard Ashman score –the songs sort of all sounded the same to me – but still toe-tapping. My 10-year-old daughter’s barometer, however, might prove me wrong. She’s been singing the songs from the soundtrack for weeks now (we got an advanced copy of the CD; critics get perks, you know). Her particular favorite is “Dig a Little Deeper,” sung by Mama Odie. If I had to pick one, I liked Tiana’s “I want” song, “Almost There.”

And wouldn’t you know it? Disney has finally animated its first African-American princess. Anika Noni Rose is quite winningly as the voice of Tiana. I was able to join her, John Lassiter, Terence Howard and others in a panel discussion about the importance of The Princess and the Frog. Here are some of their comments and observations:

2009_the_princess_and_the_frog_007John Lassiter:
“When I was up at Pixar and when the studios down here decided that were not going to do hand drawn animation anymore, it broke my heart. Never in the history of cinema has a film been entertaining to an audience BECAUSE of the technology. It’s what you do with the technology. So when the merger of Disney and Pixar happen, the very first decision we made was we were going to bring back hand drawn animation. And as we started working on [The Princess and the Frog] and bringing people back, it was so exciting. Some of the artists left the studio that were working on hand drawn animation because they didn’t want to be kind of re-trained for computer animation. But some of the artists were re-trained. So we brought both of those groups back together and never have I worked a group of artists who had more to prove to the world; it was a dream team of artists. This art form is spectacular. And I asked from them to aim high. ‘Let’s make great art’ I said, so we chose two films to look at: Lady and the Tramp and Bambi. Bambi for the bayou, the nature and almost impressionistic qualities, and Lady and the Tramp for the humans, architecture and character design. Pinnacle of Walt Disney’s style.”

Anika Noni Rose: “I think it will mean different things to different people in that theater. It will depend on what time they grew up in. For my nephew, it will be the norm. He will think nothing of it. It will be his first princess. Period. For my mother, it’ll be something she’s been waiting for – and her child, no less. For my grandmother, it will be something she never thought would happen. Each person who sits in that theater will have a different journey that will bring to the story and it will make the story different for them. So that is something really beautiful about what it is being made because … Disney is Americana, and we have simply opened a new chapter in Americana. Something that’s been here a very long time but hasn’t necessarily been shared. So in that respect, it’s just another step in the completion of the story of what America is in this fantasy world.”

Terence Howard: “And for me, I’m in complete agreement on what Anika is saying. When they were in talks, production on this film, Barack Obama wasn’t in the White House. So it is very apropos that we have two African-American princesses at the same time that this movie is coming out. It’s just a happy accident, a wonderful coinky dink. But there’s always been nobility in every culture and in every race, just the same way there have been geniuses in every culture and race. It’s nice to have Disney platform that.”

Anika Noni Rose: “I do remember wondering to myself if there would ever be a chocolate brown. After seeing Snow White, I mean, they NAMED it. [Laughs] Snow White, what! But I didn’t necessarily feel deprived as a child, you don’t know, you’re living in your world. I do remember strongly seeing Charlayne Woodard in a production on TV called Cindy – and it was Cinderella! And Charlayne Woodard was fantastic! I was shocked because it just wasn’t something that I thought was the norm. As far as being a role model, that’s difficult. I think it’s wonderful and I’m honored that people would think of me as a role model. On the other hand, I think that it is sort princess-and-the-frogof dangerous to choose a person and lift them up so high. I’m gonna play a role that somebody doesn’t like. At some point, they are going to be, ‘She was AWFUL!’ and think bad things. But I think if we can separate those things and think to yourself, ‘Wow, I really like how she’s handled her career. I like the way she handles herself as a person’ then I’m really honored and amazing. I hope it does push other children to look up and say, ‘See that star up, the one you can barely see that twinkles small, that’s one I’m going to grab.’ And they do it.”

Terence Howard: “I hope this movie will set a landmark and a precedent for other culturally diverse films. I’m very happy that Disney took this step, but I’m looking forward to having more of it. I mean, Disney has already covered most of the world in the films that they’ve made. The Little Mermaid was a fish, but every little girl could relate to that little mermaid. With Minnie Mouse and Mickey Mouse, you never wondered about whether they were black or white. Every child could relate and associate with it. I’m just looking forward to the numbers on this film coming back very well and being happy to have participated.”

John Lassiter: “What’s very important to me in making these films is that we wanted to make a DISNEY animated film. Something that feels like a very classic Disney animated film yet is brand new. To me, these films are like an engine that pulls a big train. There’s no other company like the Walt Disney company to take these characters and make them come alive and stay alive beyond the boundary of the film.”

How to Watch: “Fantastic Mr. Fox”

fantastic_mr_foxStep 1: Combine the late Roald Dahl’s clever storytelling, director Wes Anderson’s cinematic sensibilities and an engaging vocal cast and you’ve got the animated Fantastic Mr. Fox — one quirky, dangerous, sweet and entirely entertaining flick.

Step 2: Flesh out the story a bit. Anderson and his writing partner Noah Baumbach (The Squid and the Whale) had to pump up Dahl’s original classic so that it could be made into a more complete film. While the book really only focused on three farmers – Boggis, Bunce and Bean: “One fat, one short, one lean. These horrible crooks, so different in looks, were nonetheless equally mean” – and their murderous intent on catching the sly, chicken-stealing Mr. Fox, the film paints a more complete picture of Fox (George Clooney) and his life underground. His loving wife (Meryl Streep) wants him to settle down and take a less hazardous job, while his moody adolescent son (Jason Schwartzman) just wants to gain his dad’s approval. Fox, however, is bored with the mundane and moves his family into a tree house, overlooking the three Boggis, Bunce and Bean farms, all brimming with temptations Foxy can’t resist. Fox ends up getting his family – and most of the surrounding woodland animals – in trouble with the farmers, BUT he also ends up saving the day. In a way.

Step 3: Don’t talk down to kids; they can handle it. While I still think Spike Jonze’s Where the Wild Things Are does the job, I will admit the director may have faltered by making WTWTA a bit too cerebral for the wee ones. Anderson, however, takes his cue from Dahl, who was a master at keeping a child’s attention while adding enough wit and mean-spiritedness for adults to enjoy. Plus, Anderson’s peculiar style meshes so very well with Dahl’s own peculiarities, it’s like Anderson was destined to make a movie based on a Roald Dahl story. I sort of feel the same way about Tim Burton remaking Alice in Wonderland.

FantasticMrFox-3Step 4: Speaking of Tim Burton, don’t let the stop-motion animation stop you. While this technique is still one of the most painstakingly detailed form of animation, so visually cool, Anderson wanted Fantastic Mr. Fox to go one step further than just the usual animated fare. Instead of the actors sitting separately in sound booths to record their parts, the director set it up where the actors met in the English countryside and did their parts almost as a radio play, with everything being recorded as they acted it out. I’m sure this was the only way Anderson COULD do it, if wanted the film to be distinctly his, and it pays off. The dialogue seems much more organic, and Anderson employs some of his favorites, including Schwartzman, Bill Murray as Badger, Willem Dafoe as Rat, Michael Gambon as Mr. Bean and Owen Wilson as Coach Skip. Adding Clooney and Streep to the mix is just pure genius. Wouldn’t be surprised is Clooney joined the Anderson gang permanently, but then Wes would have to fight the Coen brothers, Grant Heslov or Steven Soderbergh for Clooney’s time.

Level of difficulty in watching Fantastic Mr. Fox: Easy as reading one of Roald Dahl’s books. Did you know he wrote the screenplay for Chitty Chitty Bang Bang? The creepy Child Catcher who steals kids and puts them in cages makes a lot more sense to me now.

How to Watch: “Planet 51″

planet_51_poster_mStep 1: Chalk this one up to bad timing. After all the other animated CGI films this year, Planet 51 just feels like a rehash, and not nearly as charming as it wants to be.

Step 2: Add more oomph to the premise. Planet 51 starts off as a reversal of misfortune. An American astronaut, Capt. Charles “Chuck” Baker (Dwayne Johnson), lands on Planet 51 in order to planet a flag but finds it’s already inhabited by a population of little green people, who are basically stuck in a ’50s Ozzy and Harriet episode and are desperately afraid of being invaded by, well, aliens. It’s the AMERICAN that’s the alien this time, get it? Chuck manages to escape capture by the army and eventually befriends a local named Lem (Justin Long), who tries to let the rest of his world know Chuck isn’t a monster, as well as help Chuck get back to his spaceship so he go home on time. Yeah, it doesn’t really get much better after that.

Step 3: More comedy, less silliness. It tries to make all these pop culture references (which I’m getting real tired of), as well as paying homage to every alien-type movie there is, from E.T. to Alien to War of the Worlds and all those bad 1950s sci-fi B-movies. None of it hits home, unfortunately, not like say the already released and hilarious Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs. And there lies the rub for Planet 51: its vocal cast – including Long, Johnson, Jessica Biel (as Lem’s object of desire), Gary Oldman (the army general) and Seann William Scott (Lem’s alien-obsessed friend) – can’t really measure up to Cloudy‘s Bill Hader, Anna Faris, Neil Patrick Harris and Andy Samberg in terms of laughs. In fact, Cloudy – and the rest of the more stellar animated competition released this year — casts a big shadow over Planet 51.

Level of difficulty in watching Planet 51: Eh, fair to moderate. Maybe if they had waited a year to release, it could have stood out a little more.

How to Interview: “Fantastic Mr. Fox”

wesandersonWriter/director Wes Anderson is one of my favorite filmmakers, ever since Bottle Rocket, his first film. I just dig his style – the stories about broken or unorthodox family circles, the great production design, the title cards always in the yellow Futura Bold font, the eccentric soundtracks. So, when I heard he was tackling children writer Roald Dahl’s delightful Fantastic Mr. Fox – as a stop-motion animated film about a clever Fox (George Clooney), who manages to steal from three mean farmers AND maintain a happy home life with his wife (Meryl Streep) and his son (Jason Schwartzman) – I had a feeling there would be some perfect symmetry between the two. I was correct (my review of the film to come soon).

Needless to say, I was more than a little excited to meet the director whose films I have so admired, and, as an added bonus, got to speak with Jason Schwartzman as well, a long-time friend and frequent co-star in most of Anderson’s films. God, I loved him in Rushmore. Here’s what the guys had to say about making Fantastic Mr. Fox – and about the man who inspired them as kids: Roald Dahl.

Step 1: Love your original source material
Wes Anderson: “[Fantastic Mr. Fox] was the first book I legally owned in our household, that was my property. I still have it and it has a little book plate in there from the school fair with my name on it. But I also loved all the other ones. My older brother would read them and hand them to me when he was done … A certain point [he and co-writer Noah Baumbach] would say, ‘So, what should we put here? Oh, let’s look at the book.’ We were also trying to figure out how to expand because the book is short. There’s not that much plot in it. Sort of just enough plot for the middle of the movie, we had to think about what happens next. But we had to do it and come up with something good. And because it was adapted from [Roald Dahl's] work, we could sort of get into character as Roald Dahl, imagine being him and ask ‘What would he do?’ That was our method.”

Jason Schwartzman: “I knew it as a little kid. My mom read to me Charlie and the Chocolate fantastic_mr_foxFactory and The Twits, which was my favorite one. And the movie is so scary. Have you seen the movie? Whoa. I knew [Fantastic Mr. Fox] as a kid, too. It’s crazy that I could be a part of a real piece of literature, not only literature but something that means a lot to a nation, a world. I heard he was the most beloved in all of England. The country did a poll, he’s the No. 1 most loved writer.”

Step 2: If you want to get to know an author, live in his country house for a little while
Anderson: “It’s a wonderful place, that house. There’s so many details there, I’d think ‘One day I want to have THAT where I live, I want to do it like that.’ Even just simple things … for instance, the dining room table was sort of a long table with chairs. But where [Dahl] sat is unusual; it’s an armchair, with a little side table with a telephone with five lines, a notepad, all his stuff. It was like a dining room table AND his office. I really liked that. And now that’s where his wife sits, in this big chair. He was like 6’7” or something like that, big chair and she’s sort of small in the chair. But that’s where she runs the show from that spot. You really feel his personality in that place.”

Step 3:  Match your own sensibilities with the material. It’s OK, Wes, it works, trust us
Anderson: “My goal was to make [Fantastic Mr. Fox] as Dahl as possible. Even though I’m American and we made all the animals American, Noah and I wrote more comfortably and thought we could be freer and hopefully funnier writing in an American way. Our own idiom or something like that worked better for us. But we fully expected to expand it the way Dahl may have done himself. And in the end, it seemed like something I would have done, but it was not deliberate. I mean, it may seem that way because I was making the decisions but not because I wanted it to feel like another thing I did. On the last movie I did [Darjeeling Limited], people said they thought it was a lot like the other movies I’ve done, but I felt like, ‘We’ve gone to India, we are on a train, it’s totally different!’ I guess it’s not something I’m able to regulate, [my style] that comes through.”

fantastic-mr-fox-robbersStep 4: Make that style work with a stop-motion animated film, even if it kills you
Anderson: “I have a way of thinking about staging and design and sets. Of the whole range of things you can think of, my entire range is only here [indicates a small box]. And it doesn’t go outside of that. So when something is happening over there, I find a way to make it fit over here. Working with all these talented people whose lives are dedicated to stop-motion animation and making these miniature things seem like they are alive was amazing. There are techniques they’ve learned and ways to do it that are effective, but I had my own ways that come from NOT having experience with [stop-motion animation]. And I wanted to shoot it just the same way I would a live-action movie, which in the end became extremely challenging.

“I expected to do this more like Tim Burton, write the script, design the sets, draw up the shots and then hand it over and the team of animators would animate it. I thought I would go direct another movie during that time, come back work on the score. And I realized pretty early on that wasn’t going to be possible. Which then meant for two years, it was everyday, from the moment you wake up. So if you want one long shot and not cut during it and lots of puppets animated, it’s going to take longer. But I’m happy with it, we were under budget, so we managed to figure it all out.”

Schwartzman: “People touched it. On the one hand, you know it’s not real, that it’s animated but what gives it a feeling of reality is that it’s human. Humans made this movie, no computers.”

Step 5: Forget the sound booths, do it as a radio play
Schwartzman: “Do you know we did this movie in a very unorthodox style? Let me tell you about it. We actually did most of the recording live on location. On farms, all together. That was part of Wes’ whole concept. When he brought me in on Darjeeling Limited, he only had a small kernel of an idea: three brothers on a train in India. But parallel to this was HOW he wanted to make it. No trailers for actor, no craft services. All actors do their own hair and makeup. We are going to shoot it on a real moving train in the desert and we are going to all live together in a big house. And that is what we had with [Fantastic Mr. Fox]. He had a finished script, but he also had the way in which he wanted to do it, unorthodox, getting all the actors together and doing it as a radio play. You drive by these billboards of these animated movies and they’ve got the most awesomeness cast but then you realize, ‘Aw, they never met.’ And that’s fine. I mean, the way Pixar does it, they are the Beatles of animation, and I have a lot respect for a Pixar actor who has to sit in a room by himself  and having to generate an authentic performance. Even though I hadn’t done animation before, it was fun to do it in this new, fun way, really acting it out. For instance, if there was a scene outside, we all went outside. If we had to be digging in the scene, we’d all start digging in the ground. And if we were schwartzman-clooneyeating, we all were really eating. The sound was recorded with just one microphone. And that’s how we could get overlapping and mistakes. It’s always an adventure with Wes, now that I think about it.”

Step 6: Realize it’s not that bad to dig in the dirt with George Clooney
Schwartzman: “It’s surreal. When you watch this, you just realize what an incredible voice he has. Because we were doing this all together, there would be scenes I wasn’t in, so I’d sit there with Wes and George and Bill [Murray] and watch. I’d close my eyes, sitting close to George Clooney, listening to his voice. I know it sounds funny, but fuck, he’s got such an incredible voice – nooks and scratches and cuts on that voice. Pretty amazing.”

Step 7: Don’t underestimate kids
Schwartzman: “I know there are brilliant people who work at the studios whose job it is to dissect society and ask people questions, do polls and all kinds of stuff. So obviously, they do know something, but … I will say a couple of things: First, that’s the great thing about Pixar, they smuggle in so much. You’re watching it, and I’m laughing and getting so much out of it. And then I look at the little kids around me and they are laughing, too. And I’m wondering, are they laughing because we adults are? Somehow, it’s soaking into their bodies, like other messages, death whatever. Like in Up, that’s a heavy movie in the beginning. I think little kids are little humans, they feel so much. I’m now an adult, and that’s a problem so many adults speaking about what they think kids feel. And now I’m not even in touch with kids. I remember when I was a kid, playing video games when my parents were having a dinner party and some like older person with glasses, walks in and I’d see them thigh down and they ask ‘What are ya playing?’ I’m like, ‘You don’t know, get out of here.’ And now I’m THAT dude. I was at a party, ‘So what is this thing, you can play tennis holding this thing?’ … we are just like little people with so many emotions, angry and confused. Why do kids go lock themselves in closets for hours and hide from people? Had I seen [Fantastic Mr. Fox] when I was little it would have helped me. I felt little and that girls didn’t like me back. I felt different, I totally was different. Made fun of all the time, never as good an athlete that I wanted to be. So, I totally support filmmakers for making movies that are a bit complex for kids.”

How to Watch: “A Christmas Carol”

a_christmas_carol_jim_carrey_scrooge_first_lookStep 1: Hold onto your mug of warm apple cider. This newest, action-packed version of A Christmas Carol could get a little bumpy.

Step 2: Imagine Ebenezer Scrooge as a reluctant action hero. Charles Dickens might be turning over in his grave, but director Robert Zemeckis sure thinks old Scrooge (Jim Carrey) can take a licking and keep on ticking. The classic story remains the same, with the miserly man being taught a lesson or two from the pesky Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come. But in this high-tech, RealD 3D adaptation, his adventures turn into a thrill ride. In all the many action sequences, Scrooge gets bounced around like a rag doll; I mean, that old coot is TOUGH. Of course, all of this should appeal to the young video-gaming age, who, I guess, needs this kind of stimulation to make it through what they might otherwise think is another boring old story. But with the very young, they might get scared out of their little wits by some of the scary images being thrown at them in incredibly crisp 3D.

Step 3: Hire Jim Carrey to play the original Grinch. Really, who else could play Scrooge, as well as the three Ghosts, in an animated, motion-captured performance? He is definitely the right choice, with a face he can turn into any kind of caricature that he wants. But with everyone else, I have the same problem with the technology I’ve had since The Polar Express. The other humans – such as Gary Oldman as Bob Cratchit or Colin Firth as Scrooge’s nephew Fred – just look weird and unreal. Like talking mannequins or something. It throws me off, takes me out of the emotions of the story.

Step 4: Tell a tale told (too?) many times before. Even with all its machinations and amazing visuals, ultimately, it’s still Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, which has been done and done. The defense for this is that it’s for a new generation of kids who might not know the timeless Christmas story. My question is, do they really care? They might, but if not, at least with this Christmas Carol, there is some exciting action.

Level of difficulty in watching A Christmas Carol: Pretty easy. If you’re under 5, it might be rough, but for everyone else, it’s an enjoyable Christmas-y adrenaline rush.

How “Toy Story” Continues

Woody_buzz

Toy Story put CGI animation — and Pixar — on the map. Toy Story 2 is in that elite group of sequels that are actually better than the first. And now Toy Story 3 … could it possibly surpass the first two? Here’s the first trailer, so you decide: