How to Watch: “The White Ribbon”

Step 1: Chalk up The White Ribbon as one of those German art films, in which the images are stark and minimalistic, the action languid and slow – and little to nothing is either revealed nor resolved. Coming from German auteur Michael Haneke (Funny Games, The Piano Teacher), it’s all very intellectual and thought-provoking and makes a statement about oppression and feudalism in a pre-WWI German village. But the film is also often maddeningly dull and puzzling for no apparent reason besides being self-indulgent art for art’s sake.

Step 2: Set the mood. The White Ribbon takes place in a small, rural village, in which a wealthy land Baron (Ulrich Tukur) employs over half the town to harvest his crops. There’s the hard-headed Steward (Josef Bierbichler), who tends to the grounds; the desperate Farmer (Branko Samarovski), who depends on the Baron for work; and then the other villagers who compose the other half, including the stern Pastor (Burghart Klaußner) and the lascivious Doctor (Rainer Bock). Each of these village men all have rather large families, with many children, and the film’s sadistic, central core comes from what happens to those children behind closed doors.

Step 3: Suffer the children. As narrated to us by the only seemingly kindhearted man in the village, the Schoolteacher (Christian Friedel), he describes a series of incidents one summer that set things in motion: The Doctor falls off his horse and breaks his collarbone after the animal is tripped by a thin wire; the Farmer’s wife dies when she falls through rotten floor boards on the Baron’s estate; the Baron’s only child is found beaten by a cane. Then, as Haneke peels back the layers, we begin to see what life is really like in this village, witnessing the abuse and the oppression, and watching how these creepy, Children of the Corn-looking kids may or may not be acting out.

Step 4: Wonder why nothing’s happening. Of course, writer/director Michael Haneke’s masterful craftsmanship is something to appreciate and admire, especially in his black-and-white vision with Ribbon. The imagery is both stunning and startling. Haneke also obviously gets a kick out of exploring humanity’s cruel nature, as evident in his other films, including Funny Games (maybe he has some issues to work out). There are moments in the film in which you feel something truly dreadful is going to happen, something will be resolved, but then nothing. Finally, at the end, the Schoolteacher tells us WWI has begun and bang, we’re out. Huh? Still, The White Ribbon is the type of film that picks up awards, so its recent Golden Globe win wasn’t surprising and neither would an Oscar win for Best Foreign Language.

Level of difficulty in watching The White Ribbon: Really hard. I’m just not the kind of movie watcher who enjoys being wrapped in existentialistic ennui – or in this case, existentialistic sadism – just for the sake of watching an art film. I left the theater, shaking my head, mumbling, “I sat through over two hours of this for nothing. I need to go take a nap.”

How to Go Back to “Wall Street”

Will Oliver Stone’s Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleep be more relevant in this age of big banks failing and whatnot? Does the credo “Greed is good” still apply? Can Michael Douglas really pull off the Gordon Gekko act again? Can you take Shia LaBeouf seriously as a Wall Street whiz kid? Actually, from this teaser trailer of the sequel, LaBeouf comes off looking fairly dapper, as does Douglas with his cigar. Check it out:

How to Watch: “Edge of Darkness”

Step 1: Leap off the Edge. On the surface, Edge of Darkness might seem like your typical violent revenge thriller, but it actually has some intriguing layers and surprising twists that get your full attention.

Step 2: Get revenge. Of course, one of those layers is the film’s star, Mel Gibson, who returns to the big screen after an eight year absence, looking a little worse for wear but still very commanding. He plays Tom Craven, a veteran Boston cop, who tragically watches his beloved 24-year-old daughter Emma (Bojana Novakovic) get blasted by a shotgun right in front of him. Everyone thinks HE was supposed to be the intended target, being a detective and all, but Craven doesn’t buy it and soon begins investigating the how and the why. What he uncovers shows him aspects about his only daughter’s life he never knew: She had a boyfriend; She worked for a top-secret nuclear facility; and most importantly, she was trying to expose something potentially damaging on a national level.

Step 3: Think outside the box. This last layer, as it were, sets Edge of Darkness apart from the usual grieving-ticked-off dad-looking-to-kill-all-those-involved-in-daughter’s-death scenario because the film is actually an adaptation of a 1985 award-winning BBC miniseries of the same name. Helmed by Martin Campbell, the miniseries’ original director, you get the sense they tried to cram as much of the six-part miniseries into a two-hour movie as they could. But award-winning screenwriters William Monahan (The Departed) and Andrew Bovell still manage to create a cohesive storyline. There’s plenty of revengeful acts and bloodshed to be had, but the story becomes as much a murder mystery with political and conspiratorial undertones as anything else. As Craven starts to dig, he turns up some ugly stones, including the nuclear facility’s Machiavellian chief Bennett (played with relish by Danny Huston, one of the go-to actors to play villains), as well as a British assassin named Jedburgh (portrayed brilliantly by the always good Ray Winstone) – a mysterious, if slightly menacing, piece to the whole puzzle. Listen carefully when he’s on screen, though; I’m sure I missed something, due to his soft tones and accent.

Step 4: Act what you know. Speaking of accents, Gibson does a fair job with the whole Boston cadence but does lapse here and there. It doesn’t really matter, though. Gibson knew Edge of Darkness was the right kind of project to make his big-screen comeback with and eases into familiar territory, shooting guns, running bad guys down and delivering lines like “I’m the guy with nothing to lose.” It’s all vintage Mel – and honestly, it’s not that bad to have him back. He also has a nice rapport with Serbian actress Novakovic, for the brief time they have together as father and daughter. They are convincing, which, in turn, makes what Craven does understandable. Unlike say Taken (which coincidentally was released this time last year), another father-daughter relationship that isn’t nearly as believable, even though Liam Neeson kicks even harder ass than Gibson.

Level of difficulty in watching Edge of Darkness: Pretty easy. It’s definitely a compelling thriller, but don’t count on Mel Gibson to regain his A-list stardom right away. He’ll need to earn it again.

How Bruce Willis Cops “Out”

OK, I finally caught the trailer to the new crime comedy Cop Out, with Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgan as homicide detectives on the prowl in the big city. Now while watching, I tried to wrap my brain around the idea Willis would do such a movie with 30 Rock‘s annoying Morgan. Then I noticed Seann William Scott was ALSO in it, which made me chuckle a little. Tell me what you think:

How to Look First at “The Ghost Writer”

Before Roman Polanski was put on house arrest in Switzerland, he was finishing up his latest flick The Ghost Writer, starring Ewan MacGregor and Pierce Brosnan. It’s about a writer who helps a former Prime Minister finish his memoirs and ends up uncovering some nasty secrets that puts his life in danger. Here’s the movie’s poster:

Sounds somewhat intriguing, but what makes it more so is that it’s from Polanski. He’s the draw, for me anyway.

How Mel Gibson Pokes Fun

For all his faults — of which there are many — Mel Gibson thankfully has a sense humor about most things. Evident when he took Ricky Gervais’ offhanded comment about his drinking at the Golden Globes in stride. And now this. On Jimmy Kimmel’s show to promote his new movie Edge of Darkness, his first starring role in eight years, Gibson decided to unveil his NEXT project — a biopic on Kimmel himself. Here’s the “trailer.” Pretty hilarious.

How Sandra Bullock Will Win Best Actress

In the last 10 days, Sandra Bullock has emerged the frontrunner in the Best Actress category. It didn’t start out as clear. At the Critics Choice Awards, Bullock tied with Meryl Streep. Then they both won Golden Globes in their respective categories (Bullock, drama; Streep, comedy). But the Screen Actors Guild award to Bullock sealed her fate as the odds-on favorite to win the Oscar. Here’s why:

1. Bullock has had a hell of comeback year – and the Academy loves winners. After a string of flops, the actress bowed out of the limelight for a few years, got married, re-evaluated her career and BAM! came out strong with her hit romantic comedy The Proposal last summer. She proved she still had that adorable quirkiness she’s been known for, but with a decided tinge of maturity layered in. Then she did something unexpected; she followed it up with a dramatic turn in the surprising hit sports dramedy The Blind Side, wowing critics with her turn as real-life Southern belle Leigh Anne Tuohy, who welcomes a homeless black teenager into her family and helps him achieve his potential as a star football player. On paper, the movie sounds like a big ball of sap, but Bullock’s no-nonsense performance transcends the cliché.

2. The Academy also loves it when a movie star steps out of her comfort zone and gives a performance unlike anything she’s done before. This has been evident in many of the Best Actress winners of late: Kate Winslet for The Reader, Reese Witherspoon for Walk the Line, Nicole Kidman for The Hours, Charlize Theron for Monster, Halle Berry for Monster’s Ball, Julia Roberts for Erin Brockovich. You get the point. Bullock falls into that pattern rather succinctly.

3. None of the other potential Best Actress nominees have the perfect storm riding them to the top like Bullock. Newbies Carey Mulligan for An Education and Gabourey Sidibe for Precious are just starting out and will perhaps have many nominations ahead of them. Helen Mirren for The Last Station is just a throw-in. Only Streep poses any real competition, but many could argue her turn as the delightfully upbeat Julia Child in Julie & Julia is really more of a supporting role, since her screen time splits with Amy Adam’s modern-day character Julie. Of course, Streep’s immaculate skills leaves an indelible impression even when she isn’t on the screen, so it SEEMS like she’s in it a lot more than she is. That’s just Meryl Streep doing what she does so incredibly well; she can’t help herself. Look, Streep is probably THE greatest actress of all time, of that I’m certain, but she already has two statuettes of her very own, and the Academy usually passes on giving the Oscar to comedic performances. It’s still great to have her name on the list, though, because – as any actress would tell you, I’m sure – Streep sets the bar, and they should all aspire to reach it.

No, I firmly believe this is going to be Sandy’s year – and if she’s finally found her groove again (and has decided to stop making movies like Premonition), Ms. Bullock could be reaping the rewards for her particular skill set for years to come.

How to Make Cash: Ask James Cameron

Ooops, he did it again. James Cameron’s Avatar has surpassed James Cameron’s Titanic as the highest grossing movie of all time worldwide. According to Nikke Finke at Deadline Hollywood, the final numbers from the past weekend have put Avatar at $1.859 billion in worldwide revenue in just 39 days, beating Titanic‘s $1.843 billion set in 1998. Finke reports:

No one thought that record could be broken, but Avatar‘s higher 3D ticket prices not adjusted for inflation did it. And News Corp insiders think Avatar‘s worldwide revenue will reach $2 billion — especially with after next week’s Oscar nominations and the Mar. 7 Academy Awards — and add $400 million to News Corp’s bottom line.

As far as North American box office grosses, Avatar‘s $555 million still trails Titanic‘s $600.8 million, but that should change very soon, especially since there isn’t any opening movies that could challenge Avatar‘s six-week streak as No. 1. Legion couldn’t do it, opening this past weekend in second place with a measly $17.5 million, or The Rock’s Tooth Fairy, which opened fourth with $14 million.

And I’m pretty sure Mel Gibson’s politically charged thriller Edge of Darkness or the rom-com When in Rome won’t knock Avatar off its throne this coming weekend, either. And next week the Academy Award nominations will be announced (Feb. 2), so you can bet there will be a bump in all the 10 Best Picture nominees, including — you guessed it — Avatar. What upcoming movie WILL end Avatar‘s reign? Maybe Valentine’s Day (opening Feb. 12), since it’s just the right kind of feel-good, ensemble romantic comedy everyone wants to see on the lovers’ holiday. We’ll see. For this coming weekend’s spotlight, though, here’s the trailer to Edge of Darkness:

How to Dine “When in Rome”

I usually just post trailers, but today, I thought I’d post a movie clip from the upcoming romantic comedy When in Rome, starring Kristen Bell and Josh Duhamel. This clip is called “Dark Dining” and it’s pretty self explanatory. Eating food in the complete darkness would make for an interesting evening, I’d have to say. Here, watch for yourself:

This might actually be a fun look-see. And I love that chick from Flight of the Conchords.

How to Enter the Three-Legged Race to Best Picture

In the most recent development in the award season roundup, the Producers Guild of America picked The Hurt Locker as their top film of 2009. Yep, it does indeed look like we’ve got ourselves a real tussle for Oscar’s Best Picture gold.

This past week, there have been three frontrunners to come forward: Hurt Locker, which got picked by both the Critics Choice and now PGA; Inglourious Basterds, which got the SAGs best cast ensemble award; and Avatar, which the Golden Globes shined their light upon. This leaves early buzz-o-meter Up in the Air out of the top spot, as well as Precious and An Education, which were tough calls anyway.

I’m just glad there’s any Oscar race at all, since it looks like the winners in the four acting categories have been decided. If you have to choose one to get excited about, the Best Picture race (which does usually go hand-in-hand with the directors race) is the best, especially now that we have THREE strong contenders instead of the usual one or two. Here’s some pros and cons to their chances of winning the Academy Award:

AVATAR

Pros: It’s got the Titanic factor – butt loads of money grossed, all kinds of box office records broken, mostly well received critically and a draw for viewers to watch the Oscars telecast. Plus, the Academy likes James Cameron.
Cons: The film is more about the visual effects than anything else, hence the reason it didn’t get nominated for the SAGs best cast ensemble. Let’s just say, Avatar won’t be receiving any nods in the acting or writing categories, unlike Titanic, which saw stars Kate Winslet and Gloria Stuart getting nominations. Plus, James Cameron has already won before.

THE HURT LOCKER

Pros: As the opposite to Avatar, Hurt Locker has superb writing and spot-on acting, along with incredibly tense, thrilling and well-crafted action sequences. And many feel it’s time for a female director to win an Oscar and thus should anoint Kathryn Bigelow accordingly.
Cons: It might be too small of a movie to win the big prize, with not enough big-name actors and/or big-name talent behind it. Bigelow is a true veteran in the directing field, but she’s made movies like Point Break. Just not as credible.

INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS

Pros: It’s got the Holocaust factor, a subject matter the Academy voters have historically loved to shower awards upon. But not only just that, also this whole Jewish revenge fantasy in which they get to kill ALL of the top Nazis. If Avatar hadn’t been the smash hit it is, I would have put my money on Basterds.
Cons: Perhaps director/writer Quentin Tarantino. I just don’t think the Academy knows what to make of him and his long-winded, gratuitously violent movies. That isn’t to say they won’t reward him at some point, since they can’t deny he is a talent to be reckoned with.

So, there you have it. If I were to make a guess RIGHT NOW, without further analysis and evaluation, I’d say the Academy will pick Avatar for Best Picture and spread the wealth with the other two. Say, for Hurt Locker, give director to Bigelow. And for Basterds, give supporting actor to Christophe Waltz (already a done deal) and maybe original screenplay to Tarantino. Of course, I’m just shooting from the hip, but it’s something to mull over.